If beauty is really in the eyes of the beholder?

and different strokes for different folks...





then why is that some people are widely considered beautiful while most others not? Don't tell me people are equally beautiful in their own way because it's so clear every place you go some people just get looked at, attracted to, or well-known much more frequently than others just because of their looks.





So other than individual preference, there must be some universal standards for beauty, right? Please don't be politically correct!If beauty is really in the eyes of the beholder?
Because many beholders have similarly wired brains that evolved to look for visual cues of health and fertility: thing like long legs, slim body, waist to hip ratio, pouty lips, wide eyes, nice skin etc. are all assessed my mentally 'normal' people as immediate clues that determine the genetic fitness of a potential mate. In other words, perception of beauty is encoded in the beholders genes to ensure the beholder bears healthy offspring.If beauty is really in the eyes of the beholder?
i think that is true.


on furst impression, of course, there are others yu notice more%26amp;


find more attractive.


but when yu get2 kno them personally%26amp;


who they truely are inside yur opinion changes.


a guy yu once thought was handsome or a girl yu once thought was beautiful, culd become less attractive.


some of the people i've liked, yu'd be surprised.


in age, our looks change. what's on the inside is what counts.


we don't look the same forever.
im pretty much considered classically beautiful by many people


but others nope





it really depends on taste.
YES, so true. I think Megan Fox is really ugly but here I get a million people telling me the opposite. It really all depends.
media sets these standards
I also think confidence plays a big part, some people just light up the room and your drawn to those people
hollywood.